Since , we've researched or tested almost every decent household blender available, from budget models starting at $40 to powerful, high-performance models topping out at $700. In all of this testing, we've found these criteria to be the most important:
With competitive price and timely delivery, Wantong sincerely hope to be your supplier and partner.
A tall, tapered jar and a strong motor. These are the two factors most responsible for creating a vortex that pulls food down around the blade, allowing the blender to process tough items like kale or frozen berries quickly without burning out.
The main downside to a tall blender jar is that the fully assembled blender might be too tall to fit under low-hanging cabinets. Blenders with wide, short jars are better for countertop storage, but you're sacrificing performance for that convenience.
High-quality plastic jars. All of our picks have jars made of BPA-free Tritan plastic, which is very durable. Many lower-end blenders don't advertise the material their jars are made from, but many are likely polycarbonate, which is slightly more brittle than Tritan. Both materials will crack if heated too high, which is why these jars should not go in the dishwasher.
We understand that some folks prefer metal or glass jars. But you'd be hard-pressed to find a powerful blender with a glass jar because the combination can be dangerous. If you accidentally left something like a metal spoon in the blender and turned it on, the glass could shatter.
Stainless steel jars are durable but opaque, and we like to monitor the progress of purees and emulsifications from all sides'not just through the lid. However, if you want to avoid plastic, Vitamix, which makes our top pick, sells a 48-ounce stainless steel blending jar separately. We tested it, and it worked well'but it'll usually cost you another $200.
Good value and durability for the price. For many home cooks, the holy grail seems to be a $50 or $100 blender that performs like a $500 Vitamix. But that isn't realistic. Starting at around $200 and up, high-end blenders'often called high-performance blenders'offer more power, and they produce much smoother textures. High-performance blenders also tackle tasks you'd never want to try in a budget-priced blender, such as making peanut butter or milling grains.
That said, there's nothing wrong with opting for an affordable midrange blender to make the occasional daiquiri or smoothie. So we've tested blenders in a wide price range, with the understanding that, for the most part, you get what you pay for.
A good warranty. The most common complaint we've seen regarding cheap blenders is that their motors burn out easily and their jars crack or leak. But even higher-end blenders can encounter burnout from excessive stress. That is why a long warranty is important, especially if you're paying a lot for a blender. Our high-performance blender picks all come with warranties of five to seven years.
A simple interface, with an on/off switch, a pulse button, and a variable-speed dial. Preset programs for making smoothies, mixing soups, or crushing ice can be great if you want to multitask in the kitchen while blending. But we've also found that these functions rarely deliver purees as smooth as when we control the speed and time with the manual setting.
A well-fitting tamper to cut down on blending time. With a tamper (a small plastic bat that fits safely in your machine while it's running), you can burst air pockets and push food toward the blade without having to stop the machine.
The only time using a tamper wouldn't be helpful is with a cheaper blender. These models don't come with tampers because they have weaker motors, and forcing frozen and thick mixtures into the blades is too much stress for them to handle without burning out.
This high-performance machine is worth the investment if you use a blender regularly to make things like thick smoothies, pureed soups, or motor-taxing nut butters.
The Vitamix offers the best performance you can get in a home blender. This model has been one of our favorite blenders since , and it's the classic Vitamix that has remained the standard for pro chefs and blender enthusiasts. It produced the most consistently good results across all of the tests, and this blender was the most delightful to use.
The Vitamix consistently blended more gracefully than any other blender. The combination of the jar's shape and the motor strength created a vortex that pulled ingredients down into the blades with ease.
It also made some of the smoothest smoothies in our tests. Though the prize for the absolute smoothest drinks went to the Cleanblend Blender, the difference between drinks made in the Cleanblend and the Vitamix was marginal. The smoothie made in the Vitamix had just a few more whole raspberry seeds.
The Vitamix excelled at nut butters and mayo. This blender was the only model we tested that smoothly blended peanuts and almonds into butter. Other picks, including the Cleanblend and the Oster, spit bits of mayo up the sides of the jar and out the lid's center hole. But the Vitamix kept the mixture moving smoothly and evenly around the base of the blade.
It had the best range of speeds. The Vitamix 's low is really low, and this blender produces a noticeable shift as you advance through each number. This range of speeds made the Vitamix the best blender we tested for hot liquids: You can start at a lazy swirl and gradually increase the speed so that hot liquid is less likely to shoot up toward the lid. By comparison, on its lowest setting, the Cleanblend has a forceful start, which increases the chances of a painful eruption of hot soup.
The Vitamix 's tamper helps it blend really fast. A tamper is essential for breaking up air pockets and pushing ingredients down toward the blade while the machine is running. By keeping the ingredients moving with the tamper, we were able to whip up a smoothie in less than 60 seconds.
When we used models that didn't have a tamper, we often needed to stop the blender to burst air pockets or scrape ingredients down the sides of the jar with a spatula. In some cases, we also had to add more water to the smoothie to get all of the ingredients to move around the blades. So it took longer to blend a smoothie in those machines'often with more-watery results.
Its Tritan-plastic jar is sturdy and comfortable to hold. And in the five years we used ours in Wirecutter's test kitchen, it also remained clear and free of cracks.
It's easy to clean. Just blend 8 ounces of hot tap water with a couple drops of dish soap for about 30 seconds, and then rinse out the jar.
And it's quieter than others we tested. No high-powered blender could be described as quiet, but we found the Vitamix's noise to be quieter than the roar of our runner-up, the Oster Versa.
The Vitamix is equipped with an automatic-shutoff feature. Should its motor overheat, this keeps it from burning out. In our experience, this blender should be able to handle a lot before it gets to that point. But if yours does shut off, it's best to let the machine rest for an hour before you try to use it again.
It's backed by a seven-year warranty. This softens the blow of spending $400 on a blender. According to Vitamix's customer service, the approximate time between filing a claim and receiving your blender back in working order (or a certified refurb) is six to 10 days. For an additional fee, you can buy a three-year extended warranty for the .
In , we tested some attachments that are available (as separate purchases) for the Vitamix : the Vitamix Personal Cup Adapter and a 48-ounce stainless steel blending pitcher.
We tested the Personal Cup Adapter package (which includes two 20-ounce double-walled blending cups with lids and an adapter fitted with blades) against our personal blender picks.
The Vitamix Personal Cup Adapter works just as well as the personal blenders we recommend. In our tests, it performed on a par with both models at pureeing vibrant kale pesto, silky date shakes, and thick smoothies.
The trade-off is that the tapered cup is small, with a capacity that's 12 ounces less than the Nutribullet's. And the bottom is quite narrow, so if you want to maximize the Personal Cup Adapter's blending capacity, you need to be strategic about filling the cup (tiny fruit first, chunkier fruit later). By comparison, the Nutribullet has wide cylindrical blending containers that can accommodate large chunks of fruit and ice, no matter how you load them.
If you already own a , it's convenient to get the adapter instead of another standalone personal blender. But you have to weigh that convenience against the cost: Compared with our recommendations in our standalone personal blender guide, the Vitamix adapter is more expensive than our top pick.
If you're looking for an alternative to a plastic jar, consider the Vitamix 48-ounce stainless steel blending pitcher. The advantages to stainless steel are that it doesn't stain or retain smells. But the 48-ounce stainless steel blending pitcher has less capacity than the full-size, 64-ounce plastic container that comes with the . And like other low-profile blending containers, the stainless steel jar also works best when it's at least one-quarter full. That said, in our tests it easily blended a thick, 24-ounce berry-kale smoothie, with few seeds left whole.
Senior editor Marguerite Preston has used her Vitamix on a weekly basis since , and she says it's held up great. Her family uses it mainly to make smoothies, herb-based sauces, and the occasional batch of oatmeal-banana pancakes.
We also used a Vitamix in our test kitchen for five years and had nothing but excellent results. It finally did burn out, but only after we put it through strenuous use over the course of many tests for this guide and others. Still, it easily outlasted the Oster Versa, and it made many more (and better) batches of nut butter and extra-thick smoothies before we pushed it to its limit. Since our Vitamix was still under warranty when it burned out, we contacted customer service, and the representatives promptly replaced it.
I've also used a Vitamix at home for years, and it's still my favorite household blender, period. I long-term tested our runner-up pick, the Oster Versa, for six months and noticed some glaring differences: The Vitamix can handle more without its motor straining, and the Vitamix's tamper is much better than the Oster's (which is really hard to get down in there).
Christine Cyr Clisset, deputy editor and author of a previous version of this guide, said she finally bought herself a refurbished Vitamix after years of long-term testing various Wirecutter blender picks. Christine said the first five (or so) times she used her , she noticed a slight burning smell while making her morning smoothies.
During a call with customer service, she learned that when you're blending a thick smoothie, Vitamix recommends that you start the blender at the lowest variable speed setting, and then immediately turn the dial to 10'while vigorously tamping at the same time. Christine had been starting on low and then very gradually increasing the speed, likely stressing the motor. She reports that the burning smell has subsided since she's followed the advice from Vitamix.
For many people, the biggest issue with the Vitamix is its steep price. This blender is normally at least twice the price of our runner-up, the Oster Versa. But after years of testing and using the Vitamix , we find that it's more durable and overall more effective than any other blender we've tried.
You can save some money on a Vitamix if you opt for a certified-refurbished model. A certified reconditioned Vitamix comes with a five-year warranty (with an option to extend coverage three more years, for an additional $75).
At more than 20 inches tall, the Vitamix is a big appliance. It's too tall to fit under some kitchen cabinets. If size is an issue, and you're willing to give up some of the functionality you get from a tall, tapered jar, Vitamix makes other blenders (as mentioned below) that have a shorter profile.
The Vitamix doesn't come with any presets, just a variable-speed dial. However, even though it's nice to be able to press a button and have your blender run through a smoothie-making program, this is not really essential. You'll probably stick close to your blender anyway, in order to use the tamper to get things moving, and it's not hard to adjust the dial if you feel the need to. With this blender, it's also easy to get good results without any presets.
Among the models we tested, this Oster Versa blender provided the best balance of performance and price. It's not as powerful or durable as the Vitamix , but it's a good model for people who use a blender only two or three times a week.
We don't think you can beat the value of the Oster Versa Pro Series Blender. This machine isn't quite as powerful as the Vitamix , but it is about half the price. And it beat most of the other blenders in its price range at making silky smoothies, purees, and blended cocktails.
Smoothies made in the Oster Versa were much smoother than those made in other lower-priced blenders. But it doesn't achieve the absolute smoothest drink textures you'd get from the Vitamix or the Cleanblend'it left whole raspberry seeds in smoothies and made a slightly grainy piña colada.
This blender made a decent nut butter and velvety puree, but it struggled with mayonnaise. Compared with nut butter made in the pricier Vitamix, the nut butter made in the Oster Versa was slightly crunchier, and it required at least two cups' worth of nuts to blend properly. And when we made mayonnaise in this blender, we were able to make an emulsification only once out of four tries.
We found the Oster Versa easier to control than the similarly priced CleanBlend, thanks to its wide range of speeds. The Oster Versa's low speed is sane enough that you can start pureeing a batch of soup without having hot liquid shoot up the sides of the jar. The Cleanblend, despite its variable-speed dial, seems to have only two settings: high and higher.
Unlike our other picks, this blender has manual speed controls and preset programs for soup, dip, and smoothies. So the Oster Versa is more versatile than the pricier Vitamix , which has only a manual variable-speed dial. To get presets with a Vitamix blender, you need to spend even more.
This blender's tamper is a little too short and oddly shaped. Compared with the smooth, cylindrical tampers of the Vitamix and Cleanblend models, the Oster Versa's tamper has three flat pieces of plastic that meet in the middle. Even so, it still sufficiently bursts air bubbles and helps move things like peanuts around the blades, so it's better than no tamper at all.
Like other high-performance models, this blender is beefy. Its base takes up 8 by 9 inches of counter space. But at 17½ inches tall, the Oster Versa fits better under most kitchen cabinets than the Vitamix or the Cleanblend, both of which are over 19 inches tall.
Like the Vitamix , the Oster Versa shuts off if the motor is in danger of overheating. If this happens, you should allow the blender to cool for 45 minutes before you run it again. Doing this reduces the risk of permanent motor burnout.
Should it burn out, the Oster Versa comes with a limited seven-year warranty. This covers 'defects in material and workmanship,' including the motor and the Tritan jar. The policy is about the same as the coverage from Vitamix, which offers a seven-year warranty on the . In our experience, Oster's customer service is courteous, and it quickly addresses any issues with a blender while it's under warranty.
Know that the Oster Versa won't deliver the longevity and performance of a Vitamix . The Oster Versa's hardware feels a little cheaper (which is understandable since it costs a good bit less than the Vitamix). And the Oster Versa's biggest flaw is its durability: We found through personal experience that it can burn out after two to three years of moderate to frequent use. But Oster honors its seven-year warranty and is quick to send a replacement (we got ours in about a week).
For three years, we used the Versa to make smoothies and soup twice a week on average. And during that time, it never quit on us'though we occasionally detected a faint burning smell from the motor when we were blending thick smoothies. But the motor permanently died when we formally tested the three-year-old Versa again for our update: When we were one minute into blending the nut butter, the machine's overload protection cut the motor. We should've let the motor rest for 45 minutes before restarting, but we let it cool for only 10 minutes before our second attempt'and that's when the motor burned out completely. However, our blender was still under warranty, and Oster quickly sent a replacement.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENTThis blender makes even silkier smoothies than the Vitamix . But its limited range of speeds and short tamper make it less effective for hot soups or nut butters.
For more information, please visit v blender machine.
If you can live with less-nuanced controls (read: you don't blend hot liquids often), and you're willing to take a chance on a shorter warranty, the 1,800-watt Cleanblend Blender costs about the same as the Oster Versa and produces finer purees.
The Cleanblend Blender made the smoothest smoothies and silkiest piña coladas of all of our picks, including the Vitamix . When we strained the Cleanblend's kale-and-berry smoothie, hardly any raspberry seeds remained in our fine-mesh sieve.
But it's not great for making soup. This blender kicks into high gear even at the lowest setting. In our soup test, it sent hot liquid shooting up to the lid.
And mayo made in this blender was noticeably warm. That's because the blender's motor seems to produce a lot of heat. The Cleanblend was better at making mayonnaise than the Oster Versa, though.
So far in our long-term tests, the Cleanblend Blender's motor has outlasted the Oster Versa's. In our testing, our four-year-old Cleanblend and Vitamix blenders both powered through two rounds of nut butter without quitting. The same test fried our three-year-old Oster Versa. That said, Oster offers a seven-year warranty on the Versa Pro Series Blender, but Cleanblend offers only a five-year total warranty.
Cleanblend will extend the warranty to a total of 10 years, for an extra $75. This is a great value when you consider that the blender, including a decade of coverage, still costs about $150 less than a Vitamix . You're not going to get the all-around great performance of a Vitamix for less than half the cost, but the Cleanblend is still a good value.
However, Cleanblend's customer service is reachable only by or a form on its website. So that might not inspire confidence in some people. Both Vitamix and Oster have a customer service number that connects you to a representative.
This blender's base takes up about the same amount of counter space as our other high-performance picks. (Our budget pick, the KitchenAid K150, is smaller.) And at 19 inches high to the top of the lid, the Cleanblend has just slightly more clearance under most kitchen cabinets than the Vitamix (which measures closer to 20 inches).
Senior staff writer Michael Sullivan has used an older version of this blender in his home since , and he said he's never had an issue with it. He pulls it out about six times a month to make smoothies, sauces, soup, or occasionally emulsifications like mayonnaise. He has even crushed ice in it a few times, and he said so far it has never stalled.
Wirecutter writer Sabrina Imbler used the Cleanblend in their home for more than a year. They used it three to four times a week and never experienced stalling or burnout. Sabrina told us: '[My] only minor complaint is that sometimes the blender rattles a bit on top of the base, which makes me a little wary, but otherwise it's great. I only use it for smoothies and mixed drinks, never any kind of nuts, but it pulverizes ice pretty quickly. It's also the perfect size for two smoothies. I really like that it's a dial as opposed to number buttons'easier to [crank] up if my stuff isn't blending fast.'
Although we favor the Vitamix for its tall, tapered pitcher and simple functionality, we understand that some seeking this brand's quality and blending power may have other priorities. If you strongly prefer presets, or you need a shorter jar that will fit your space, consider looking at other models.
Over the years, we've tested our way through much of Vitamix's product line. Here's what we think about the models we've looked at so far:
Compared with our top pick, the Vitamix has the same 64-ounce capacity and speed-control dial, but it lacks the 's ultra-high-speed switch. We found that the 's low-profile jar failed to maintain a vortex as well as the 's narrow, tapered one. Also, for smaller volumes (2 cups and under), the 's tamper didn't reach down quite far enough to burst air pockets. The is part of Vitamix's C-Series, which includes the . So if you already own the and want to try the 's tapered jar, you can currently purchase the jar for $150.
The Vitamix Explorian E320 is nearly identical to the . A Vitamix customer service rep told us that the two blenders had the same motor base, jar, tamper, and functionality. The main difference between the two is that the has a small on/off switch located just below the control panel. On top of that, the E320 is available only as part of a package with two personal cups and an adapter.
Vitamix added the Explorian Series E310 variable-speed blender to its lineup in . We decided not to test this model because we didn't think it was a good value. Although it's typically about three-quarters the price of the Vitamix , the cost difference is directly proportional to the E310's smaller blending jar (48 ounces versus the 's 64 ounces) and shorter warranty (five years versus the 's seven years).
We've also tested three of the four Vitamix Ascent Series blenders (, , and ), and these models come with the low-profile pitcher. The Ascent blenders are the upper echelon of the Vitamix line, with updated features including digital control panels and built-in timers. Like all of the low-profile Vitamix blenders we tested, these Ascent models aren't as graceful or effective as the at blending smaller volumes (though you can buy extra attachments for that).
The Vitamix Ascent blender has most of the same core controls and blending power as the , but the features an updated control panel that includes a digital display with a count-up timer (which could be helpful for those who strictly follow recipes). The Ascent has the additional feature of three blending programs (smoothies, hot soup, and frozen desserts).
The Ascent has a couple of upgrades that set it apart from the models; these upgrades include a programmable countdown timer (which will stop the blender when the time is up) and five preset blending functions (the most of any Vitamix). Apart from those features, the performs similarly to other Ascent models.
ModelAscent AAscent AAscent AAscent AWirecutterWe also tested the Ascent Blending Cup and Bowl Starter Kit (which you have to buy separately); it can blend and chop small amounts, and it's meant to take the place of a separate personal blender. The Ascent models are equipped with what Vitamix calls Self Detect technology. Basically, the blender base recognizes the type of blending container and adjusts to the appropriate speed control.
Both the cup and the bowl work as intended'eventually. During our tests, it sometimes took us a few tries to get the blender base to recognize the cup or bowl. After the eventually complied, we were able to blend a thick smoothie in the cup and chop garlic in the bowl'both pieces performed well. But compared with personal blenders, the Vitamix blending cup is narrow and small, so you have to chop up large chunks of fruit to maximize its 20-ounce capacity.
The Zwilling Enfinigy Power Blender didn't make it past our first round of tests. To get a decent, 20-ounce smoothie, it took us over two minutes of blending and vigorous tamping'enough to make my hand sore for two days after testing. The jar is too wide and the tamper too stumpy to accommodate smaller volumes'and we don't even consider 20 fluid ounces to be 'small.'
The KitchenAid K400 blender is more powerful than the KitchenAid K150, our budget pick'but not enough to warrant the price jump. And in our tests, the K400 wasn't nearly as good at blending fibrous kale as the less-pricey Oster Versa and Cleanblend blenders.
We tested an older but similar version of the Blendtec Designer 650. While it killed it when making smoothies and blended drinks, its lack of a tamper limits its usefulness: It failed to make peanut butter (a tamper would have helped), and the preset speed for soup was frightening, with hot liquid flying wildly around the jar.
We tested the Blendtec Total Blender for our review but found that it couldn't compete with the Vitamix we tested at the time. The lid felt flimsy, and the panel controls seemed cheap.
In our tests, the powerful Breville Super Q threw a smoothie up the sides and into the lid (and even onto my face, when I opened the cap to add more liquid). This blender pulverizes tough foods, but the Vitamix also does that'for less money and with less drama inside the jar.
The Cuisinart CBT- Hurricane blender struggled in our tests. Making thick smoothies and peanut butter involved adding more liquid, a lot of starting and stopping, and banging the jar on the counter. Without the Turbo button of the Hurricane Pro (more on that just below), this model is just another middle-of-the-road blender.
The Cuisinart CBT- Hurricane Pro performed similarly to the Cuisinart CBT- Hurricane blender, except it didn't make mayonnaise as well (we achieved emulsification on the third try only). We did find the Turbo button useful for creating a fine puree. But again, without a tamper to burst air pockets, this blender needed a lot of tending to produce uniform, smooth purees.
The Ninja Master Prep Professional did a decent job of making smoothies, mixing bean spread, and blending margaritas. But due to its design, this model is terrible for making mayonnaise (the motor is top-mounted, so you can't drizzle anything into the jar). The stacked blades are also dangerously sharp, so they're difficult to clean.
The Ninja Professional Blender didn't perform well. The green smoothies we made had a weird, confetti-like texture. And our mayo was especially loose, which meant the blender was whipping in too much air. Every time we ran this model, we detected a strong, burning-motor smell.
The Waring Commercial Xtreme made notably smooth smoothies, and it felt substantial. But ultimately it didn't perform better than our picks from Vitamix, Oster, or Cleanblend. If we were willing to pay this much for a blender, we'd go for a reconditioned Vitamix instead.
This article was edited by Marilyn Ong.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENTCapacity: 64 ounces | Function: Automatic | Size: 8.5' x 8.5' x 17.25'
Vitamix has a lot of blender options, but in my reporting, the 750 was the preferred model of professionals and regular cooks alike ' including me. It's expensive, yes, but well worth the investment for its incredibly sharp blades and strikingly powerful motor. (Don't just take my word for it: Moon Juice founder Amanda Chantal Bacon has been using the 750 in a professional capacity in her shops for years, turning out a high volume every day, and says neither function has degraded.)
At home, I find it makes quick work of soft ingredients; it takes only a few minutes to get silky soup or light and airy hummus. It can easily handle tough ingredients like nuts and grains, as well as fibrous ones like ginger. This also means it's extra-efficient at crushing ice for smoothies and, in my case, cocktails. The self-cleaning option really works, too. You simply add a drop of soap and some water, the machine whirrs for about a minute, and then you rinse it out. One of my biggest hesitations with adding appliances to my kitchen is the space they take up, including in the sink and dishwasher. But this function means as soon as I'm done, it's a breeze to wash and put away. I've never had an issue with water spots, either.
And though I haven't needed to use it yet, all Vitamixes come with a great warranty ' something noted by Green Kitchen Stories co-founder David Frenkiel and recipe developer Sophia Roe. 'If any piece of it gets run down or stops functioning properly, they take care of it,' Frenkiel says. Nisha Vora, creator of Rainbow Plant Life and cookbook author, points out that you can buy additional compatible parts, too. 'It comes with a 64-ounce container, but I got a 32-ounce one, too, to make things like curry paste and hummus without having to triple the volume.' Finally, it's got a lower profile than many, able to sit underneath most regular kitchen cabinets.
Capacity: 36 ounces | Function: Automatic | Size: 8' x 7' x 15'
After testing this Blendtec, I was surprised to find it felt just as powerful and durably built as the Vitamix 750. I used it to make a sungold tomato sauce to freeze for winter and after blending on high for about two minutes, it was silky smooth, with absolutely no bits of skins or seeds. It also has a pulse setting I used for foods with a chunkier consistency, like a Swiss chard pesto. The blades broke down the firm leafy greens ' but not so much that they turned to pure liquid. To be clear, the Vitamix does have its perks: a longer warranty, more speeds, a dial instead of a touchscreen (simply a personal preference for me). But the Blendtec is undeniably strong.
It comes enthusiastically endorsed by Christine Sahadi, owner of New York City's Middle Eastern market and restaurant, Sahadi's, too. She told me about it a while back, noting in our interview that both Blendtec and Vitamix make very good quality units. 'I just personally like the Blendtec,' she says. She has owned hers for more than a decade and finds that its super powerful blades, which operate at five preset speeds, emulsify sauces, dressings, and aioli handily. It also, perhaps most importantly for Sahadi, makes the perfect hummus. 'If you don't have a really good blender, you have to add a lot of ice water or cooking liquid to help smooth things out,' she explains. 'By the time you get there, the hummus has become too drippy.' The Blendtec, it's important to note, has just a bit more than half the capacity of the Vitamix 750, so you won't be able to make things in quite as big batches.
Capacity: 68 ounces | Function: Automatic | Size: 17' x 13' x 9'
If you want a high-speed blender on the larger side ' and one that's less expensive than both the Vitamix 750 and the Blendtec ' I recommend this Hurom. I heard about it from Strategist writer Kat Gillespie, who notes the plastic container's sturdiness and says the base 'has a nice weight to it,' though she warns that the appliance is definitely 'pretty hefty and takes up space.' The machine has both automatic controls (for smoothies, ice crushing, and soup) and manual ones, and Gillespie mostly uses hers for smoothies. 'It makes the perfect consistency ' very smooth, no lumps, even if you don't measure out a good ratio of liquids to solids ' and is very convenient as you go about your morning and do other things,' she says, in reference to the automatic button you can simply press and then walk away from.
Capacity: 48 ounces | Function: Manual | Size: 11' x 8' x 18'
A more affordable Vitamix model is this Explorian Series E310. If you don't care about the automatic settings on the 750 or the smaller container size of this one, I believe this one is a great bet. It comes recommended by Ksenia Avdulova, founder of Breakfast Criminals, who uses it daily. 'I personally prefer the manual switch experience versus touchscreen,' she says. Culinary artist Maryah Ananda, who also uses her E310 every day, says the manual switches allow her to pulse to control texture if she wants a chunkier soup or sauce. Still, if she wants seamless emulsification, 'the strength is unmatched,' she says. 'Blending down things that are very fibrous like ginger or galangal can be tough, but this Vitamix makes it so easy.' She also says she appreciates that unlike some cheaper blenders she's used in the past, food doesn't get stuck in the nooks and crannies of this one, which has a dishwasher-safe basin.
Capacity: 64 ounces | Function: Automatic | Size: 11' x 8' x 17'
Vitamix's A Ascent Series model has a touchscreen, which makes it super easy to wipe down, as well as a timer of which Gaby Dalkin, the cookbook author and blogger behind What's Gaby Cooking, is a big fan. It allows her to blend for exactly the amount of time she wants before it automatically shuts off. Brandon Jew, chef and owner of Mister Jiu's in San Francisco, also told me that he loves this particular feature, along with the 'great' auto functions like dips and hot soups. Dalkin says the A is even easy enough for her toddler to turn on, allowing her to help make smoothies and 'feel invested in the process.' It features the same sharp blades as the 750 and a comparably powerful motor (the Ascent has slightly higher wattage ' instead of ' but not so much that it should be discernible). If you're deciding between the two, the difference mostly comes down to the type of interface you prefer.
Capacity: 32 ounces | Function: Manual | Size: 8' x 12' x 16'
Sometimes a personal-size blender is all you need (and though the NutriBullet is my top pick, it's worth reading my full guide to them if you're set on that size). Indeed, I find one can be even better for small batches than larger blenders because ingredients have a better shot at being evenly blended when everything is closer to the blades. Not to mention it's easier to store and wash. This blender has become part of my regular rotation. I pull it out often to make dressing to use throughout the week; it simply emulsifies my go-to mixture of olive oil, lemon juice, mustard, and honey better than I can do by hand. Plus, the lid allows me to store it directly in the fridge without decanting into another container. The blades are powerful enough to get a pretty smooth consistency of tougher ingredients, but the manual control allows pulsing for a more chopped texture, too, like if I'm making salsa verde (you stop and start the machine by pressing down with your hand on the top of the jar once it's secured to the base).
Strategist managing editor Kelsie Schrader bought this blender as an upgrade from the more basic model she used before to make weekly smoothies. While she says the original worked well, she's noticed this newer one is more powerful. 'It blends a bit faster and more thoroughly than the 600-watt one did,' she says of the 900-watt machine. 'I can load it up with fruit and all my other ingredients, and it's perfectly smooth in less than a minute,' she says. Over a year later, it hasn't slowed down at all. Her favorite feature is the matte black design (the blender comes in nine matte colors and seven metallic ones), which she says is a nicer finish than the gray of her previous one, and 'never looks streaky or dirty.'
Capacity: 61 ounces | Function: Automatic | Size: 7.6' x 7.6' x 16.7
I think Zwilling's full-size blender is one of the sleekest-looking on the market. For a generally bulky product, it has clean lines and a satisfyingly geometric shape, with a chic fluted design on the jar. It's not all in the appearance, though: In the year I used it (before I made more permanent room for my Vitamix), it performed beautifully. The pre-programmed settings are nice to have: I like the frozen cocktail one, and am also a fan of the wash button. But you can also manually control the blades with a turn of the dial and a push of the button ' this feature lets me keep an eye on consistency as I go so my emulsified dips get to the exact texture I want.
Capcity: Various | Function: Manual | Size: 6.2' x 7.5' x 12.4'
If you want more immersion blenders, I've written a whole separate guide, but I'd be remiss not to include my best overall pick here. It comes recommended by a few pros: food writer, editor, and cookbook author Matt Rodbard; recipe developer and writer Posie Brien; food writer and editor Alyse Whitney; and myself.
Though the functionality of an immersion blender is different from that of the other machines here, it can often be an adequate substitute ' for a lot less money and with a much smaller footprint. I will note that the one big exception is when it comes to hard ingredients. If you plan to make smoothies, other icy beverages, or nut butters regularly, you'll definitely want to go with one of my picks above. But if you plan to use it more for blending sauces, soups, and dressings, an immersion blender will likely suit you just fine.
The Breville Control Grip itself is powerful and allows you to choose between 15 speeds. That wide-ranging variance comes in handy for liquids: I can start lower so ingredients don't splatter, then gradually move up. It also allows for subtle-but-clear differences when making mixtures like salsas where I don't want to overblend, or immersions like aïoli. (This is as opposed to variable speed immersion blenders where sometimes, it can be harder to land exactly where you want to.)
Are you interested in learning more about v mixer machine? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!